1=5,2=10,3=15,4=20,5=?

Question

1=5,2=10,3=15,4=20,5=?

Answer 1

1 Not 25!









Interesting question, if 1=5, 2=10, 3=15, 4=20... what is 5=?

This has been going around Facebook lately. What is the answer?



You might be rushing to say obviously 25! Algebra help online might help you solve the equation and give this answer. But if you’re a bit of a smart-*** you might be thinking, hey wait a minute, those are equals signs! The answer is obviously 1! It says so on the first line. If 1=5, then surely 5=1. If you’re even more of a smart-*** you might point out that the 1-5 on the left side could be symbols, (much like x or y) and that the value of the symbol 5 could be anything.



However, let’s pretend that the correct interpretation is that you put the left side into some function f(x), such that you get the value on the right side.



f(1) = 5

f(2) = 10

f(3) = 15

f(4) = 20

f(5) = ?



The obvious candidate would be f(x) = 5x, in other words to multiply the number on the left side by 5, which would give f(5)=25.



That’s boring. Can we construct a function such that the first four lines still hold true, while f(5) takes on any arbitrary value? The answer is yes. You might remember from math class that you can solve a polynomial equation by moving everything to one side so you have (some polynomial) = 0 and then factoring the polynomial.

x3 - 6x2 + 5x = -12

could also be factored and written as

(3-x)(4-x)(1+x) = 0

You can confirm this by expanding the latter expression and realize that the fully expanded form matches the former expression. The latter form has an advantage when solving the equation because = 0 puts a constraint on the left side: anything multiplied by zero equals zero. For this reason, we know that for example when 3-x = 0, the whole expression on the left side equals zero. We can see that if x = 3, the whole expression becomes

(3-3)(4-3)(1+3) = 0*1*4 = 0

and we can conclude that since we have equality, x=3 is one of the roots for the equation.



Enough with the repetition of high school maths. How does this help us create a function that can give us an arbitrary value for f(5)? Well, let’s begin by crafting a function that returns 0 for all the values involved:

f(x) = (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)

Like before, if x = 3, then x-3 = 0 and the whole expression is zeroed out. It will still have all sorts of values for values of x other than our list of integers, 1 to 5. f(2.5) = 1.40625 for example, but we don’t care about that, for our purposes, do we?

We now have:



f(1) = 0

f(2) = 0

f(3) = 0

f(4) = 0

f(5) = 0



Pretty neat. We can now remove one term from this multiplication, say x-1 so you get f(x) = (x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5) 2 to 5 will still be “zeroed” like before, whereas 1 will now have a non-zero value.



f(1) = 24

f(2) = 0

f(3) = 0

f(4) = 0

f(5) = 0



A similar expression could be created by removing the (x-2) part from the original expression: f(x) = (x-1)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)



f(1) = 0

f(2) = -6

f(3) = 0

f(4) = 0

f(5) = 0



And so on with each term of the multiplication…

The important thing to realize, is that you can add these expressions together and use each expression to single out one of the integers in the range, and modify its value. You do this by multiplying one of the sub-expressions by any suitable value. Since any of the sub-expressions will only have a non-zero value when x equals a particular value in the list.

So let’s try out our new super powers.



f(x) = (2-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x) +

(1-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x) +

(1-x)(2-x)(4-x)(5-x) +

(1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(5-x) +

(1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(4-x)



f(1) = 24

f(2) = -6

f(3) = 4

f(4) = -6

f(5) = 24



Now you can normalize each sub-expression by dividing it with output of that expression for that value x.



f(x) = (2-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x)/24 +

(1-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x)/-6 +

(1-x)(2-x)(4-x)(5-x)/4 +

(1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(5-x)/-6 +

(1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(4-x)/24



f(1) = 1

f(2) = 1

f(3) = 1

f(4) = 1

f(5) = 1



Now you can multiply each sub-expression by the value you want the function to return for the corresponding value of x.



f(x) = 5 * (2-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x)/24 +

10 * (1-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x)/-6 +

15 * (1-x)(2-x)(4-x)(5-x)/4 +

20 * (1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(5-x)/-6 +

42 * (1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(4-x)/24



f(1) = 5

f(2) = 10

f(3) = 15

f(4) = 20

f(5) = 42



Now you can claim that the number series in the image actually represents this particular function you just created and that the correct answer for “5 =” is whatever you want it to be.



Boredom -> trolling with maths in ways no one gives a **** about.

Answer 2

Interesting question, if 1=5, 2=10, 3=15, 4=20... what is 5=?

This has been going around Facebook lately. What is the answer?



You might be rushing to say obviously 25! Algebra help online might help you solve the equation and give this answer. But if you’re a bit of a smart-*** you might be thinking, hey wait a minute, those are equals signs! The answer is obviously 1! It says so on the first line. If 1=5, then surely 5=1. If you’re even more of a smart-*** you might point out that the 1-5 on the left side could be symbols, (much like x or y) and that the value of the symbol 5 could be anything.



However, let’s pretend that the correct interpretation is that you put the left side into some function f(x), such that you get the value on the right side.



f(1) = 5

f(2) = 10

f(3) = 15

f(4) = 20

f(5) = ?



The obvious candidate would be f(x) = 5x, in other words to multiply the number on the left side by 5, which would give f(5)=25.



That’s boring. Can we construct a function such that the first four lines still hold true, while f(5) takes on any arbitrary value? The answer is yes. You might remember from math class that you can solve a polynomial equation by moving everything to one side so you have (some polynomial) = 0 and then factoring the polynomial.

x3 - 6x2 + 5x = -12

could also be factored and written as

(3-x)(4-x)(1+x) = 0

You can confirm this by expanding the latter expression and realize that the fully expanded form matches the former expression. The latter form has an advantage when solving the equation because = 0 puts a constraint on the left side: anything multiplied by zero equals zero. For this reason, we know that for example when 3-x = 0, the whole expression on the left side equals zero. We can see that if x = 3, the whole expression becomes

(3-3)(4-3)(1+3) = 0*1*4 = 0

and we can conclude that since we have equality, x=3 is one of the roots for the equation.



Enough with the repetition of high school maths. How does this help us create a function that can give us an arbitrary value for f(5)? Well, let’s begin by crafting a function that returns 0 for all the values involved:

f(x) = (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)

Like before, if x = 3, then x-3 = 0 and the whole expression is zeroed out. It will still have all sorts of values for values of x other than our list of integers, 1 to 5. f(2.5) = 1.40625 for example, but we don’t care about that, for our purposes, do we?

We now have:



f(1) = 0

f(2) = 0

f(3) = 0

f(4) = 0

f(5) = 0



Pretty neat. We can now remove one term from this multiplication, say x-1 so you get f(x) = (x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5) 2 to 5 will still be “zeroed” like before, whereas 1 will now have a non-zero value.



f(1) = 24

f(2) = 0

f(3) = 0

f(4) = 0

f(5) = 0



A similar expression could be created by removing the (x-2) part from the original expression: f(x) = (x-1)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)



f(1) = 0

f(2) = -6

f(3) = 0

f(4) = 0

f(5) = 0



And so on with each term of the multiplication…

The important thing to realize, is that you can add these expressions together and use each expression to single out one of the integers in the range, and modify its value. You do this by multiplying one of the sub-expressions by any suitable value. Since any of the sub-expressions will only have a non-zero value when x equals a particular value in the list.

So let’s try out our new super powers.



f(x) = (2-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x) +

(1-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x) +

(1-x)(2-x)(4-x)(5-x) +

(1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(5-x) +

(1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(4-x)



f(1) = 24

f(2) = -6

f(3) = 4

f(4) = -6

f(5) = 24



Now you can normalize each sub-expression by dividing it with output of that expression for that value x.



f(x) = (2-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x)/24 +

(1-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x)/-6 +

(1-x)(2-x)(4-x)(5-x)/4 +

(1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(5-x)/-6 +

(1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(4-x)/24



f(1) = 1

f(2) = 1

f(3) = 1

f(4) = 1

f(5) = 1



Now you can multiply each sub-expression by the value you want the function to return for the corresponding value of x.



f(x) = 5 * (2-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x)/24 +

10 * (1-x)(3-x)(4-x)(5-x)/-6 +

15 * (1-x)(2-x)(4-x)(5-x)/4 +

20 * (1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(5-x)/-6 +

42 * (1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(4-x)/24



f(1) = 5

f(2) = 10

f(3) = 15

f(4) = 20

f(5) = 42



Now you can claim that the number series in the image actually represents this particular function you just created and that the correct answer for “5 =” is whatever you want it to be.



Boredom -> trolling with maths in ways no one gives a **** about.

Answer 3

1

Answer 4

1

Answer 5

1

Answer 6

1

Answer 7

1

Answer 8

1

Answer 9

1

Answer 10

1

Answer 11

1

Answer 12

1

Answer 13

1

Answer 14

1

Answer 15

1

Answer 16

1

Answer 17

1

Answer 18

1

Answer 19

1

Answer 20

1

Answer 21

1

Answer 22

1

Answer 23

1

Answer 24

1

Answer 25

1

Answer 26

1

Answer 27

1

Answer 28

1

Answer 29

1

Answer 30

1

Answer 31

1

Answer 32

1

Answer 33

1

Answer 34

1

Answer 35

1

Answer 36

1

Answer 37

1

Answer 38

1

Answer 39

1

Answer 40

1

Answer 41

1

Answer 42

1

Answer 43

1

Answer 44

1

Answer 45

1

Answer 46

1

Answer 47

1

Answer 48

1

Answer 49

1

Answer 50

1

Answer 51

1

Answer 52

1

Answer 53

1

Answer 54

1

Answer 55

1

Answer 56

1

Answer 57

1

Answer 58

1

Answer 59

1

Answer 60

1

Answer 61

1

Answer 62

1

Answer 63

1

Answer 64

1

Answer 65

1

Answer 66

1

Answer 67

1

Answer 68

5=1

Answer 69

5=5

Answer 70

5=5=1

Answer 71

If 1=5,

2=10.

3=15,

4=20,

Then

5=25

Answer 72

5=25

Answer 73

5=25 and 1

Answer 74

5=25

Answer 75

If 1=5; 5=1.

Answer 76

1=5 so 5=1

Answer 77

1 or 25

Answer 78

5=5

Answer 79

5=1

Answer 80

1 or 25

Answer 81

5=25

Answer 82

25 or 1

Answer 83

25 and 1

Answer 84

1=5, then 5=1

Answer 85

25 or 1

Answer 86

5=25

Answer 87

1 and 25

Answer 88

Yep, sounds like Common Core math to me.



5 would equal 25 . . . in non-common core, reality world because of the simple concept liberals never understand.



Just because 1 = 5 does NOT mean, necessarily, that 5 = 1



Of course, your class is no doubt run by liberals who want you to stay in your little box and think the way Democrats want to instruct you to think like.



So, take the stupid answer, and put 5 = 1. It's most likely a trick question meant to make you accept that which they tell you and not think critically about it.



In real life however, it's similar to this. A = B, but B does not necessarily equal A.



Mathematically, equals means that either can be used interchangeably, which would mean that if 1 = 5, then 5 always also = 1, but in your situation, you are following a pattern where it is established that 1 = 5, but not necessarily that 5 = 1, which means that you should follow the pattern, that 5 = 25.



The logic behind this is that there is no basis for establishing that 5 = 1 because simply having 1 = 5 is not sufficient information to ascertain that 5 is also equal to 1, always. And since this is a pattern you are following, the pattern would be that the next number equal to 25.



Further logic to support this, and this is what critical thinking is that the Democrats is trying to keep you from being able to do, none of those numbers are actually equal to each other in the first place, so the rule of equality in mathematics is already broken if we are to accept those values as actually true values. The fact that none of those values are actually true, mathematically, proves that even though 1 = 5, that does not necessarily mean that 5 = 1.



We can say, however, given this situation, logically, that 5 = 1 some of the time, but we cannot say that it is a true value because we do not know that 5 = 1 all of the time. We can only say that 1 = 5 all of the time.



Therefore, since we cannot say that 5 = 1 all of the time, the next course of logic would be to assume that this isn't that, and that it must need us to follow the pattern that seems presented, which is that 5 = 25.



But like I said, the Democrats made Common Core, and they want you to be stupid and accepting of what they tell you to accept, and therefore, you should go with the stupid answer that doesn't require any critical thought, just blind obedience to the first statement, and say that 5 = 1.

Answer 89

25

Answer 90

25

Answer 91

25

Answer 92

25

Answer 93

25

Answer 94

I'm assuming these are terms in a sequence:

a₁ = 5

a₂ = 10

a₃ = 15

a₄ = 20

a₅ = ?



By inspection, this is an arithmetic sequence where the first term is 5 and there is a common difference of 5.



The general formula for the nth term of an arithmetic sequence is:

an = a₁ + d(n - 1)



a₁ : first term (5)

d : common difference (5)



Plug in your specific values:

an = 5 + 5(n - 1)



Distribute:

an = 5 + 5n - 5



Simplify:

an = 5n



Now it is asking for the 5th term, so plug in n=5:

a₅ = 5(5)



Answer:

a₅ = 25

Answer 95

1=5, so 5=1

Answer 96

25

Answer 97

25

Answer 98

25

Answer 99

25

Answer 100

5

Answer 101

25

Answer 102

5

Answer 103

5

Answer 104

5

Answer 105

25

Answer 106

Technically, if you are following the pattern of ever 1 = 5 it is assumed that the place value of 1 has been changed to 5. So, if 1=5 it 5(5) = 25. So 25. BUT you may realize, that just the the rest of these, each equation can be simplified! So 2=10 = 1=5 ! So if you take 5 and plug 35 in for the question mark, you get 5=25. BUT you simplify , and divide both sides by 5 your get 1=5..... So if you take the 5 out in 1=5, you'd realize the 5 is the question mark, and plug that in to the original question (5=?) and 5 DOES equal 5!! So 5=5 now it can be further simplified. To 1=1 if you divide both sides by 5. Take the "?" As the variable and the ? = 1. SO THE ANSWER = 1.

Answer 107

25

Answer 108

25

Answer 109

3

Answer 110

5

Answer 111

5=5

Answer 112

25

Answer 113

25

Answer 114

25

Answer 115

25

Answer 116

25

Answer 117

25

Answer 118

25

Answer 119

25

Answer 120

25

Answer 121

5

Answer 122

25

Answer 123

Three possible answers dependant upon one's reasoning:

A. 5=5, given the identity of 5 as itself, or rather anything equating to 5 as a function of any single or series of operations

B. on the fifth set of the pattern, the value would equal 25.

Not assertion 5=25 but recognising the abovementioned sequence as a pattern produced by a single, constant operation (Element of Natural Numbers X 5). This is most accurate. The people answering one are least-correct. given that the elements of natural num. 2-4 deviate from the fundamental notion of equality where Leftside= rightside, so that notation can be disregarded, and it is most likely that you mean a number, N, undergoing some constant operation (C) = a value, P : i.e 2= 2*5=10 -- 3= (3*5)=15 that is: N(element of natural numbers)*C=P



c. Or if you want to fallaciously appropriate equality as with "answer" A. : 5=1, as it was the initial assertion



In conclusion: those stating "1" think they are clever, but are not. The MOST LOGICAL, thus accurate, answer would be

for set 5 the product (P) is 25 so N(element of the real numbers) * C(constant)= P (product of N as N is the dependant variable)

5 is the constant by which N is multiplied

therefore:

Let P:= P(N)

P(N) = N * Constant

N=5, here (5th set)

C= 5:= constant value

P(N)= 5*5

P(N) = 25

The cutest (IMO) form to put this would be p(N)= 5N; a simple lil linear function.

The basic format thereof being Y= mX or f(X)=mX, equivalently.



Therefore, on the final, and fifth step of the function, the value is 25. Expressed inaccurately as (5=25).

Expressed accurately as: P(N)= N(e N) * Const.; 25= (5) *5 ; (simplified) 25= 5^2;

which, ironically is expressed equivalently as 25=25, ls=rs..

Answer 124

25

Answer 125

25

Answer 126

25

Answer 127

25

Answer 128

25

Answer 129

25

Answer 130

25

Answer 131

25

Answer 132

25

Answer 133

15 10 3

Answer 134

25

Answer 135

5 = 5

Answer 136

25

Answer 137

25

Answer 138

25

Answer 139

25

Answer 140

25

Answer 141

25

Answer 142

25

Answer 143

Since when in maths could you use a number as representative of anything other than the number itself?



The rules of mathematics have not suddenly changed. What we are seeing here is simply mathematical ineptitude. By saying that 1 = 5 does not make 1 = 5. 1 is equal to 1; 5 is equal to 5.



1 does not equal 5 and the next 3 in the sequence are equally false.



5 = 5



There is no other answer in mathematics. The question is clearly not ambiguous - it is clearly false. There is nothing to presume - it is incorrect.



EDIT: I have spotted about 11 people out of 128 so far who have either pointed out that 5=5 or that the question is false by nature. That is like 8.6% of people who have actually got the only answer it could possibly be. Not only is this question in the maths section - if it is numbers then by default it IS mathematics. If this is some kind of study to show how bad people are at mathematics then it has succeeded.

Answer 144

25

Answer 145

25

Answer 146

25

Answer 147

5=25.

Answer 148

5=25 (because it got multiplied by 5 following the rule). But also 1=5 so that means that 25=1 too. Basically 5= 1 and 25.

Answer 149

Sequence this math

1=5

2=10

3=15

4=20

5=25

All the sequence are increased 5 every single sequence.

Answer 150

1 Not 25!

Answer 151

25

Answer 152

7

Answer 153

1=5,2=10,3=15,4=20,5=25

so Answer is 5=25

Answer 154

25

Answer 155

25

Answer 156

25.as 1=5and 1×1=5×5 hence1=25 and 5=25

Answer 157

Logical answer would be 25 but it's obviously a troll equation so since 1=5 then also 5=1

Answer 158

25

Answer 159

25.

This looks like a series of numbers. Each number is multiplied by 5. Based on the way the question is written, if 1 gives you 5, and 2 gives you 10, etc. then 5 must give you 25. If you notice the the right side to each equal sign (=) is five times the number to the left of the equal sign (=). 5 is 1x5, 10 is 2x5, etc.So the last one is 25 because 25 is 5x5.

Answer 160

25

Answer 161

We're sorry, did you mean to ask, 1n = 5, 2n = 10, 3n = 15, 4n =20, 5n = ? Because then 5n = 25. No way in mathematics would 1 =5, 2 = 10, 3 = 15, or 4 = 20.

Answer 162

The answer is 1. Look at the first given fact: 1=5. If 1=5 then 5=1. Easy!

Answer 163

5=1 because 1=5

Answer 164

25

Answer 165

1=5 so 5=1

if you are calculating like this x=x*5

5=5*5

5=25

Answer 166

It's a trick question. If 1=5 then 5=1.

Answer 167

5=25

It looks like each one is multiplying the number 5 like this:

1x5=5 so then it would be that 1=5,

2x5=10 so then it would be that 2=10,

3x5=15 so then it would be that 3=15,

4x5=20 so then it would be that 4=20,

5x5=25 so then it would be that 5=25

Answer 168

It's 1

Answer 169

25 cuz rule is x5 so 1 x 5 is 5, 2 x 5 is 10 and so on

Answer 170

30

Answer 171

30

Answer 172

13

Answer 173

I like those two huge answers up there. Guys, if 1=5, then 5 must be equal to 1 as well.

Answer 174

Obviously 1. In the first statement itself it's given 1=5 so 5 will be equal to 1 only what else. The numbers in between are just for confusing us.

Answer 175

5=25 because it goes up in an order. Every number jumps 5 so 1=5 5=5x5 5x5=25

Answer 176

answer is 1 because said in the begining that 1=5 so 5=1

Answer 177

5 = 25

#1 ; 5(1) = 5

#2 ; 5)2) = 10

#3 ; 5(3) = 15

#4 ; 5(4) = 20

#5 ; 5(5) = 25



#n = 5Xn = 5n

Answer 178

Mathematically, It would be equal to 25, but since it says, "1 = 5" in the beginning, then 5 must also be equal to one! So the answer is 1.

Hope that helps!

Answer 179

I'm not bright as someone before me, so I'm just gonna say that



5 = 1

since

1 = 5

Answer 180

This is very easy. Since you already stated that 1=5 it means that 5=1. '1=5' is an equation and both sides of equation are equal, so it's exactly the same if you turn it around i.e. '5=1'.

Answer 181

1=5,5=1

Answer 182

Did someone change the meaning of the equal to sign? I always thought = meant equal to, and so none of these expressions make any sense. If you want to use a function, specify it. Otherwise invent a new operator rather than over-riding the equals operator, like they do in computing languages, where there is an = and == and === which mean entirely different things, if the keyboard doesn't support newfangled operators.

Answer 183

IF 1=5 THEN 5 ALSO MUST BE EQUAL TO 1

Answer 184

5 is one because one is 5. unless it was a ratio. 1:5, 2:10, 3:15, 4 :20, 5:25.

Answer 185

Actually it is mathematically incorrect to say:



1=5



Because "1" and "5" are both constants and two different constants can never be equals.



The correct form of the question is as follows:



f(1) = 5

...

f(5) = ?

Answer 186

It's 'one'

If 1=5, 5=1

Answer 187

1. cause 1=5

then 5=1 easy logic.

Answer 188

5=5



This is indisputable, as 5 does NOT equal any number other than 5, regardless how many false statements precede the question.



An old riddle, attributed to Abe Lincoln:



"If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?"

Ans:

"Four. Calling a tail a leg, doesn't make it one!"

Answer 189

25 because 1*5=5, 2*5=10, etc.

Answer 190

Uhg... no idiots... Its 25. 1 = 1x5, 2 = 2x5 3 = 3x5 etc so its 25

Answer 191

You said .. 1 = 5 .. so .. 5 = 1

Answer 192

Excellent answer! We dont need to get trapped by the traditional conditioning, which looks like 5=25, just as we are taught: A for apple, B for bat!! Could very well be A for bat, and B for apple? Why are we looking for a pattern that have been reinforced on us.

Answer 193

if 1=5

then it is obvious 5=1

:)

Answer 194

lol 5=1

Answer 195

5=25

Formula: F(x)= 5x

Answer 196

55

Answer 197

25. Arithmetic.

5=25.

Answer 198

25........ 1=5, 5 does not equal 1

Answer 199

Umm 5 is equal to 5

Answer 200

25?

Answer 201

1 because if 1=5,5=1

Answer 202

1 = 5, which is the first equation given, but I don't believe the problem is clearly explained, because if it concerned progressions, the value for 5 = would be 25.

Answer 203

either 25 or 1.

Answer 204

If depends on you, if its a real math question, the answer is 25, but if its not a question your teacher gave, then the answer is 1 as you've stated before

Answer 205

5=25, multiply 5 by the first number

Answer 206

25 if that's wrong then 1

Answer 207

25?

Answer 208

If 1=5 then 5 must equal 1but it makes no sense so this is not mathematics it's jokes and riddles. Just stupid.



To make sense therefore, one must assume that the equals sign means something OTHER than equals, for

instance, indicates or suggests, in which case 5 indicates/suggests 25.

Answer 209

25?

To me it's like a pattern that goes by 5's,

5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35... etc...

Answer 210

5=1 is the right answer

Answer 211

I was going to say 25 but then I read all the others answers and now I'm confused

Answer 212

Pretty easy considering at the complete start of the sequence it says that 5=1.

Answer 213

5 = 25



what is so difficult about it

Answer 214

5=25, I guess

Answer 215

25! Each number is being multiplied by 5.

Answer 216

in the sequence, each left side number is multiplied by 5 to get the right side number. Therefore, with 5 on the left, you would multiply 5*5 to get the right side number, 25

Answer 217

answer is 1

Answer 218

The answer is 5=25.

Answer 219

5 = 25. You're multiplying by five to get the desired answer.

Answer 220

25!

Answer 221

ANY number you want!! Seriously. I'm partial to 42 (the meaning of life - Hitchhiker's Guide...)



They gave no other restraints like a "linear sequence", so we could come up with ALL sorts of equations!

Answer 222

a5 =25

Answer 223

25 & 1

Answer 224

25 because everything is getting multiple by 5

Answer 225

simple 25

Answer 226

Anything, including 25 (top comments are wrong, 25 works... obviously)

Answer 227

These kinds of questions are really very dumb, in my opinion. You can't just saying that x=y, because they aren't equal. It makes no sense. You could apply them to numbers, and that would work just fine.

Answer 228

5=1,5=25

Answer 229

25.

Answer 230

You're all wrong. It would be 25 in this sequence. Sorry.

Answer 231

Deez Nutz! HA! Gottem!

Answer 232

Answer is 25.

Answer 233

25??

Answer 234

1

If you wanted the answer you were looking for (25) you would have had to say 1x=, 2x=, 3x=, ect...

Answer 235

Twenty five (25)

Answer 236

if the = mean equal then 5=5

Answer 237

Its array you don't know basics of mathematics.Go back to scool math noobs.Answer is 25,6

Answer 238

-135

Answer 239

25. Thus 1,5,25 have same value.

Answer 240

25? I don't know I'm dumb, sounds like a trick question anyways

Answer 241

I agree. 1 is the answer. :)

Answer 242

764,281.546, roughly. I rounded it a bit for convenience.

Answer 243

They are all false statements, given the meaning of the sign "=".

Answer 244

Geez, wayyyy to many numbers lol

Answer 245

uno

Answer 246

25 duh!!! The pattern is so obvious so why is everyone saying 1 and copying eachother gawshh!!!!

Answer 247

5463...3268464 trust me !