I answered this already about 10 minutes ago and you DELETED THE QUESTION.
Why on Earth did you do that? Now I have to type out my solution all over again.
Don't do that again, because (as you may have noticed) nobody else is going to give you a complete solution like I am, and I'm not going to type it out again!
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Summary:
There are infinitely many solutions, whenever 3n = 1 + 4m. This gives d = (5m+2)/3.
If you restrict yourself to integers, then a single integer T will generate all possible solutions:
(m,n,d) = (3T-1, 4T-1, 5T-1)
Not only will this generate all possible integer solutions for integers T, but it will generate other real-number solutions if you plug in other real numbers for T besides integers.
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Solution:
If these three are in arithmetic sequence, then:
d = (2m+n) - (3m-n) = 2n - m
d = (5m+1) - (2m+n) = 3m - n + 1
Setting those equal gives you:
2n - m = 3m - n + 1
3n = 1 + 4m
This is the only restriction, which means you can use any values of m and n and obtain consecutive terms of an arithmetic sequence.
For example, m=2, n=3, gives you: 3, 7, 11 (d=4).
But m=5, n=7, gives you: 8, 17, 26
If you are restricted to integers, then you know:
n = (4m+1)/3
which means m has to be a multiple of 3, minus 1. This way, n works out to be an integer too.
You can parametrize the solutions based on this:
m = 3T-1
n = (4m+1)/3 = ( 4(3T-1) +1)/3 = 4T - 1
Use an expression from above to find d:
d = 2n - m = 2(3T-1) - (4T-1) = 5T - 1
This gives you all possible solutions:
(m,n,d) = (3T-1, 4T-1, 5T-1)
Here are a few examples:
m=2, n=3 → 3, 7, 11 → d=4
m=5, n=7 → 8, 17, 26 → d=9
m=11,n=15 → 18,37,56 → d=19
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
BEWARE of the answer by Michael Rasch. He has made SERIOUS algebra mistakes that make his answer wrong and very misleading. He thinks:
(2m+n)-(3m-n) = -m
But it is not. It is:
(2m+n)-(3m-n) = 2n - m
You cannot use:
[third term] - [first term] = 2d
to help you in this problem because the third term given is the same as the first d plus the second d we already have:
[2m+n] - [3m-n] = d = 2n - m
[3m-n] - [5m+1] = d = 3m - n + 1
Now what happens if you subtract:
[5m+1] - [3m-n] = 2d
You get a new equation:
2d = 2m + n + 1
But that's just the sum of the previous two equations:
d + d = (2n-m) + (3m - n + 1) = 2m + n + 1
and not only does it not provide new information. It is impossible under any circumstances for it to do so. You cannot use this false "third" equation to help you eliminate one of the variables and find a specific single solution.
This user is mislead and has made an algebra mistake that steered him off a path of circular logic that leads to no conclusions, onto a road of flawed logic that leads to false ones.